| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 0.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 37.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Samsung RC410/RC510/RC710 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG RC410/RC510/RC710 |
| Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110119 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 20 '23 at 13:23 |
| Run Duration | 121 Seconds |
| Run User | CHL-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
35.3%
Below average
|
40% 66.3 Pts
|
18% 131 Pts
|
8% 128 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0A2) 3.8GB
Driver: Ver. 8.15.10.2900
|
0.38%
Terrible
|
0% 0.7 fps
|
0% 0.6 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAH20107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 183 114 92 76 50 MB/s
|
37.7%
Below average
|
37% 164 MB/s
|
52% 17.2 MB/s
|
90% 141 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1334 MHz
|
20.5%
Poor
|
20% 7.13 GB/s
|
16% 5.5 GB/s
|
24% 170 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 16 | 5 | 60 | 14" | 1280 720 | SEC3549 |
Typical RC410/RC510/RC710 Builds (Compare 40 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung RC410/RC510/RC710
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples | 23x |
| Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples | 14x |
| Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples | 32x |
| GeForce 315MNvidiaBench 1%, 3,213 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |