Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 136%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 12:52
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900 12-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Memory 77.2
1-Core 141
2-Core 281
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 1,080
97% 816 Pts
64-Core 1,923
119% 1,923 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7600
XFX(1EAE 7601) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 153
Reflection 178
Parallax 294
125% 208 fps
MRender 233
Gravity 188
Splatting 218
175% 213 fps
Poor: 56%
This bench: 133%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 240GB SSD 240GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN08435
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 198 188 186 181 169 MB/s
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.3% Above average
Read 77.9
Write 205
Mixed 194
SusWrite 186
38% 166 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 28.5
114% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 99.4
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 133
102% 135 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 111 111 110 113 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 147
Write 148
Mixed 103
SusWrite 110
94% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 101%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
66GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 97 135 135 134 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 144
Write 102
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 127
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
KLEVV KD48GU880-36A180Z 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 32
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 29.9
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 35: 0P 1R 6G 12B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
35% 25% 77 486 446 60 31.5" 1920 1009 SAM0D35 C32F391
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 2,391 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $719
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback