DEPO B75H2-M3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemDEPO B75H2-M3  (all builds)
MotherboardECS B75H2-M3
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120808
Uptime5.6 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 06:55
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 89.1
2-Core 174
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 297
38% 285 Pts
64-Core 291
18% 291 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7450
PowerColor(148C 7450) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.4% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.9
1% 1.77 fps
MRender 1.3
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.4%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 256GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 284
Write 167
Mixed 275
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 60.8
4K Mixed 35.3
125% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 37.3
DQ Write 69.6
DQ Mixed 42.5
35% 49.8 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 100%
USB FLASH DRIVE 1GB
0GB free, PID b113
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 15.2
Write 2.2
Mixed 4.2
7% 7.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264AZ-1G6P1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
59.5% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 18.5
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 17.5
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 3 60 19.1" 1296 1024 HWP26E8 HP L1950
Typical B75H2-M3 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: DEPO B75H2-M3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $161
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback