Acer Aspire ES1-533

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire ES1-533  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Stego_AP
Memory2.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 04:07
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium N4200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Memory 38
1-Core 41.6
2-Core 65.5
30% 48.4 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 110
14% 108 Pts
64-Core 115
7% 115 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Acer(1025 1084) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4749
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
1.45% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 1
Parallax 1.7
1% 1.33 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.7
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.45%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX003J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 81 75 65 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 35.1
Write 78.3
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 73.7
38% 52.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
75% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AO1L16BC4R1-BQSS 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.7% Very poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 7.6
22% 7.57 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.2
9% 3.2 GB/s
Latency 273
15% 273 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 34 19 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0672
Typical Aspire ES1-533 Builds (Compare 376 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire ES1-533

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback