HP Laptop 14-dq1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive29.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemHP Laptop 14-dq1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86C8
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230704
Uptime5 Days
Run DateDec 19 '23 at 19:33
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Memory 57.1
1-Core 81.2
2-Core 94.2
48% 77.5 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 125
18% 130 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
HP(103C 86C8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
6.43% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 10.3
6% 8.23 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 10.5
8% 9.87 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.43%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8PS7512G 512GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0413A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 168 36 31 37 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 355
Write 285
Mixed 39
SusWrite 93
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 1.4
28% 9.17 MB/s
DQ Read 94.9
DQ Write 10.4
DQ Mixed 2.8
15% 36 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 09D5 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
45.8% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 16.4
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 11.4
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 181
22% 181 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 28 1 60 24" 1920 1009 ACI2493 VE247
Typical Laptop 14-dq1xxx Builds (Compare 676 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14-dq1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback