Asrock Z87 Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z87 Pro3  (all builds)
Memory18.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140711
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateDec 19 '23 at 18:29
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 118
2-Core 226
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 381
46% 351 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gainward(10B0 1B06) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 196
Parallax 187
146% 187 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 184
Splatting 127
121% 150 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 130%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 240GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 291 153 64 99 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 452
Write 412
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 149
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 3
40% 10.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 102%
Fanxiang S101 1TB
154GB free
Firmware: SN12989
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 173 143 163 160 167 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 107%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0406
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 113 111 119 117 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 146
Write 141
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 116
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 0.9
8% 4.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1.4
DQ Write 9.3
DQ Mixed 1.8
2% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 19%
WL3000GSA6454G 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 114 119 117 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 111
Write 113
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 117
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 95%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
108GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 83 69 75 73 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 70.3
Write 77.9
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 78.8
50% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 1319 CL11-11-11 D3-1600 Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61% Good
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 18.3
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 20
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 61%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 24: 0P 2R 4G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
24% 11% 72 213 59 60 32" 1296 759 MED34A4 MEDION TV
Typical Z87 Pro3 Builds (Compare 398 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z87 Pro3 - $162

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $524
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback