Dell Precision Tower 7910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7910
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7910  (all builds)
Memory43.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '23 at 17:52
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2683 v4
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 85
2-Core 168
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 651
58% 489 Pts
64-Core 1,670
103% 1,670 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.99
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.1% Poor
Lighting 32
Reflection 40.4
Parallax 28.2
26% 33.5 fps
MRender 46.2
Gravity 36
Splatting 36.5
32% 39.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 512GB-$290
408GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW25L0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1477 1352 1179 1484 1492 1484 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,453
Write 1,473
Mixed 863
SusWrite 1,411
292% 1,300 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 43.3
143% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 456
DQ Write 374
DQ Mixed 412
309% 414 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 207%
Great: 241%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 6x8GB
6 of 16 slots used
48GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 52.5
MC Write 44.2
MC Mixed 44.1
134% 46.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 16
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 116%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 0 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical Precision Tower 7910 Builds (Compare 1,182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback