QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive21.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory9.77GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 9.77GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory6.7 GB free of 9.76562 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '23 at 11:20
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500T
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 64.2
1-Core 75.1
2-Core 162
57% 101 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 319
38% 292 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 74%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 129GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 75 80 72 82 87 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.7% Poor
Read 194
Write 165
Mixed 161
SusWrite 79.4
34% 150 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 6.8
22% 7.03 MB/s
DQ Read 53.3
DQ Write 42.6
DQ Mixed 45.7
35% 47.2 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x9GB
1 of 1 slots used
9GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
71% Very good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 35
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 23.1
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 71%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 17 64 0" 1280 720
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 608 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback