Asus X756UAM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus X756UAM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X756UAM
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateDec 19 '23 at 09:06
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6006U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Memory 41.9
1-Core 40.6
2-Core 36.6
27% 39.7 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 120
15% 113 Pts
64-Core 115
7% 115 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Asus(1043 1230) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.21% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 5.3
4% 4.87 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 7.7
5% 6.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.21%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
807GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA0OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 83 79 69 68 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 20.1
Write 78.5
Mixed 17.3
SusWrite 71.1
34% 46.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSO4GX4M1A2133C15 Samsung M471A5143EB0-CPB 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
56.3% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 19
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 8.5
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 31 8 60 17.2" 1280 720 CMN1734
Typical X756UAM Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X756UAM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback