MSI 760GMA-P34(FX) (MS-7641)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7641
MotherboardMSI 760GMA-P34(FX) (MS-7641)  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150420
Uptime8 Days
Run DateDec 19 '23 at 03:17
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPU1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 75.7
1-Core 57.5
2-Core 106
50% 79.6 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 228
27% 209 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1212 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
20.2% Poor
Lighting 23.6
Reflection 28.3
Parallax 33.4
19% 28.4 fps
MRender 27.6
Gravity 27.1
Splatting 26
22% 26.9 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
455GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 261 259 281 239 240 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.8% Good
Read 270
Write 226
Mixed 211
SusWrite 256
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 51.8
4K Mixed 26
90% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 238
177% 235 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.M8F CT51264BA160BJ.M8F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
42.9% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 14.7
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 11
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 7.2" 1280 720 SAM0487 SyncMaster
Typical 760GMA-P34(FX) (MS-7641) Builds (Compare 436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 760GMA-P34(FX) (MS-7641)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback