Lenovo 82RN

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82RN  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '23 at 19:49
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 73.5
1-Core 157
2-Core 306
95% 179 Pts
4-Core 543
8-Core 742
81% 643 Pts
64-Core 825
51% 825 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3801) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 19
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 26.6
16% 19.8 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 20.1
15% 17.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW512GZL 512GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C01C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,868
Write 751
Mixed 167
200% 928 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 47.9
173% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 415
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 123
128% 219 MB/s
Poor: 98% Great: 274%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C22-8GRS Hynix HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.8% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 24.5
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 36.6
SC Mixed 26.7
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 15.5" 1280 720 LEN9052
Typical 82RN Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82RN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback