Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515MA_X515MA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515MA_X515MA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515MA
Memory0.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '23 at 16:28
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N5030
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
25.1% Poor
Memory 21.3
1-Core 60.2
2-Core 118
34% 66.6 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 166
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605
Asus(1043 154C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1660
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
2.17% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 3.3
2% 2.4 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.17%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee P709F128G 128GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0527B0P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 86 134 33 38 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 852
Write 345
Mixed 470
SusWrite 69.2
95% 434 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 23.6
4K Mixed 1.8
57% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 107
98% 152 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
16% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.13 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 1.4
7% 2.37 GB/s
Latency 295
14% 295 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 32 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15E6
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515MA_X515MA Builds (Compare 358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515MA_X515MA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback