HP Z840 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z840 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2129
Memory54.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170316
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateDec 18 '23 at 15:44
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 61.4
2-Core 128
54% 88.4 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 442
43% 352 Pts
64-Core 1,057
65% 1,057 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
HP(103C 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.70
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Lighting 13.2
Reflection 15.6
Parallax 11
11% 13.3 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 14.4
11% 12.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZHPV512HDGL-000H1 512GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW24H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 531 391 387 392 383 391 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 48% Great: 102%
Samsung 870 QVO 8TB-$540
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 145 146 144 63 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 346
Write 143
Mixed 188
SusWrite 115
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.6
27% 6.37 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 129%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB
777GB free
Firmware: SN06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 113 115 114 116 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 116
Write 104
Mixed 98
SusWrite 115
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 105%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SN06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 164 160 160 163 164 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 105
Write 104
Mixed 95
SusWrite 163
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77%
Great: 105%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: SN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 151 150 150 150 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 155
Mixed 85
SusWrite 150
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 105%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: SN06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 175 175 173 175 172 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 151
Mixed 106
SusWrite 174
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 103%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A5143DB0-CPB 16x4GB
16 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
91.4% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 35.4
104% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 16.7
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 92%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 32" 1280 720 SAM0BCC S32D850
Typical Z840 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,967 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: HP Z840 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 120% - Outstanding Total price: $93
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback