Asus Z9PA-D8 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus Z9PA-D8 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PA-D8 Series
Memory120.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 18 '23 at 14:55
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 76.2
1-Core 92.5
2-Core 184
67% 118 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 660
60% 504 Pts
64-Core 1,703
105% 1,703 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$120
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.12027.9001
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.4% Above average
Lighting 64.1
Reflection 63.8
Parallax 86.8
52% 71.6 fps
MRender 65.6
Gravity 73.5
Splatting 48.3
50% 62.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHGS31-500GS-2 500GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0Q00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 247 179 161 152 156 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 466
Write 370
Mixed 292
SusWrite 211
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 65.4
4K Mixed 33.4
112% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 313
237% 321 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 81%
Great: 109%
Seagate ST3000NM0023 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 44 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
67% Good
Read 189
Write 43
Mixed 60
SusWrite 43.9
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
185% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 67%
Great: 105%
Seagate ST3000NM0023 3TB
194GB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 184
Write 44.3
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 35.2
59% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
190% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 105%
Seagate ST3000NM0023 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 44 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 188
Write 43.3
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 44.1
61% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.9
192% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 105%
Seagate ST3000NM0023 3TB
424GB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 44 43 43 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 188
Write 44.4
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 43.3
62% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.9
130% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70QH0-CM 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
97.5% Outstanding
MC Read 44.4
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 35
113% 39.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 7.7
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 20: 0P 1R 3G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
20% 11% 87 201 59 60 21.5" 1280 720 ACR032D Acer V226HQL
Typical Z9PA-D8 Series Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: Asus Z9PA-D8 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $227
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback