TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F2
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171101
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateDec 18 '23 at 09:25
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 115
2-Core 215
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 531
56% 450 Pts
64-Core 539
33% 539 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 79.7%
 Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
HP(103C 8338) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 537.70
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.1% Very poor
Lighting 16.9
Reflection 31.7
Parallax 29.9
14% 26.2 fps
MRender 36.5
Gravity 31.4
Splatting 21.6
24% 29.8 fps
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 17.1%
 Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 82 102 84 91 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 74.8
Write 96.2
Mixed 7.5
SusWrite 86.2
48% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
20% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑
This bench: 46.1%
 Great: 107%
Seagate Portable 2TB
405GB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 40 40 39 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 33.3
Write 37.6
Mixed 25.4
SusWrite 39.5
25% 33.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.4
169% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑
This bench: 21.2%
 Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6MFR8N-UH Micron 4ATF51264AZ-2G3B1 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
57% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 16.5
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 17.2
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 34% ↑
This bench: 57%
 Great: 62%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 168 1 75 27" 1920 1017 ACR0560 GF276
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX Builds (Compare 1,770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel  $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples840x
Core i7-7700Intel  $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples483x
Core i3-7100Intel  $40Bench 57%, 79,299 samples234x
GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples581x
GTX 1050Nvidia  $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples396x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples112x
SSD
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples155x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples59x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples18x
RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples167x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 21,551 samples164x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 20,415 samples90x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback