Dell Precision Tower 7910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Precision Tower 7910
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7910  (all builds)
Memory16.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateDec 18 '23 at 07:03
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 159
60% 103 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 589
51% 434 Pts
64-Core 2,366
146% 2,366 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
HP(103C 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.99
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.4% Below average
Lighting 38.6
Reflection 58
Parallax 40.9
32% 45.8 fps
MRender 50.9
Gravity 36.9
Splatting 39.2
34% 42.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
371GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 045
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 422 418 425 405 420 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 411
Write 413
Mixed 391
SusWrite 417
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 43.2
143% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 108
120% 204 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
665GB free
Firmware: 045
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 423 420 426 248 222 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 413
Write 419
Mixed 390
SusWrite 361
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 46.1
148% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 157
143% 220 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M386A4G40DM0-CPB 2x31.5GB
2 of 16 slots used
63GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.2% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 11.5
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 12.4
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 21.5" 1280 720 PHL091C PHL 221S8L
Typical Precision Tower 7910 Builds (Compare 1,182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback