AZW SER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAZW SER  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW SER
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '23 at 07:02
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
37.7% Below average
Memory 57.1
1-Core 59.4
2-Core 116
46% 77.5 Pts
4-Core 105
8-Core 126
15% 116 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.3% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 6.1
4% 5.83 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 9
6% 6.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.3%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3256B-A01 256GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 662
Write 723
Mixed 752
160% 712 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 32.2
102% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 531
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 343
262% 363 MB/s
Poor: 122% Great: 215%
HP v125w 16GB
9GB free, PID 3307
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 351
Write 3.2
Mixed 12
85% 122 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
63% 5.67 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.2% Good
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 24.1
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 13.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 15 91 32 0 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical SER Builds (Compare 790 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: AZW SER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback