BOXX RenderPro 9020

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemBOXX RenderPro 9020  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10DRT-L
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151217
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 18 '23 at 05:34
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
CPU1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 49.7
1-Core 50.7
2-Core 119
42% 73.2 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 562
48% 413 Pts
64-Core 1,056
65% 1,056 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 730 Series 240GB-$250
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0420
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 144 139 140 151 158 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.2% Average
Read 220
Write 170
Mixed 151
SusWrite 146
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 34.1
4K Mixed 15.1
59% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 171
140% 200 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9ASF51272PZ-2G1A2 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
64.9% Good
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 23.7
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.5
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 205
20% 205 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 18 12 64 0" 1280 720
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback