Asus G11DF

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	260% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago.

System	Asus G11DF (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G11DF
Memory	27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180524
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Dec 18 '23 at 05:13
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100 83,528 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Memory 65.6 1-Core 94.1 2-Core 189 65% 116 Pts	4-Core 298 8-Core 311 40% 304 Pts	64-Core 311 19% 311 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Matrox C420 LP PCIe x16 39 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Device(102B 2500) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	3.29% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 5.3 Parallax 6 3% 5.13 fps	MRender 4.2 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 3.7 3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.29% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 397GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1104 887 885 876 864 854 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	260% Outstanding	Read 2,425 Write 2,239 Mixed 1,702 SusWrite 912 407% 1,819 MB/s	4K Read 61.7 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 80.5 264% 90 MB/s	DQ Read 658 DQ Write 443 DQ Mixed 523 398% 542 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 260% Great: 355%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 137GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 76 76 76 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Read 79.8 Write 70.9 Mixed 80.6 SusWrite 76.3 57% 76.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F24EB16GS 2x16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	85.2% Excellent	MC Read 32.7 MC Write 31.7 MC Mixed 29.6 90% 31.3 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 31.9 SC Mixed 23.5 71% 24.9 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	18.5"	1280 720	HWP292E HP w185e

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G11DF Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus G11DF

CPU
Ryzen 5 1400AMD $87Bench 61%, 71,313 samples	40x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	20x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	15x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	21x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	14x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	14x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	22x
SD8SN8U128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 7,802 samples	16x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	7x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	27x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	17x
M378A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 65%, 7,811 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $189

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16