PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Default string (all builds) |
Motherboard | QIYIDA X99-H9 |
Memory | 1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20220814 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Dec 17 '23 at 20:48 |
Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 29% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
|
57.6%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SSD 180GB 180GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0509
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 207 145 76 14 60 MB/s
|
42%
Average
|
|||
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
91GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 62 58 72 58 60 MB/s
|
40.3%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
19.5%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 43 | 11 | 50 | 15.5" | 1280 720 | AOC1619 1619w |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples | 1,022x |
Xeon E5-2640 v3IntelBench 71%, 3,267 samples | 959x |
Xeon E5-2670 v3IntelBench 66%, 3,953 samples | 908x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 487x |
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples | 478x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 460x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $87 |