User System

Performance Results


Gaming 131% UFO	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 154% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	170% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	82.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

5 months ago, 5 months ago.

System	HUANANZHI
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X99-TF GAMING
Memory	25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220606
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 17 '23 at 20:19
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 1,038 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	76% Very good	Memory 82.2 1-Core 99.8 2-Core 201 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 374 8-Core 806 69% 590 Pts	64-Core 1,985 123% 1,985 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479 218,061 User benchmarks, average bench 158% Zotac(19DA 1653) CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 4775 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.29 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	170% Outstanding	Lighting 256 Reflection 225 Parallax 238 208% 240 fps	MRender 266 Gravity 166 Splatting 136 148% 189 fps
Poor: 139% ↑ This bench: 170% Great: 170%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300. 960GB 573 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 446 185 269 195 195 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Read 498 Write 478 Mixed 373 SusWrite 290 92% 409 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 48.7 4K Mixed 29.6 100% 34.2 MB/s	DQ Read 339 DQ Write 284 DQ Mixed 196 178% 273 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 103%
Hitachi HDS721075CLA332 750GB-$190 3,719 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 48GB free Firmware: JP3OA3GH SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 77 78 103 108 106 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	53% Above average	Read 94.4 Write 96.3 Mixed 55.1 SusWrite 90.1 62% 84 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 76%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$97 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 75GB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 166 165 165 165 164 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	Read 158 Write 163 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 165 95% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 108%
MD05000-BSDW-RO 500GB 121 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 3GB free Firmware: 01.01S02 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 110 Write 99.3 Mixed 73 70% 94.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 154% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 78%
Hitachi HTS 721010A9E630 1TB 1,664 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 28GB free Firmware: 8101 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 137 Write 125 Mixed 35.6 72% 99.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4A-RD 4x8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 115% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 2000 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (60^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	115% Outstanding	MC Read 52.9 MC Write 44 MC Mixed 39.3 130% 45.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 18.9 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 74.8 54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 114% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 116%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	22	1	144	31.5"	1280 720	ACR06DD ED322QR

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16