HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '23 at 19:28
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 202
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 475
48% 390 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 6.4
3% 4.17 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
839GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR046
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 378 380 386 386 381 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 348
Write 442
Mixed 374
SusWrite 382
88% 386 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 67.3
4K Mixed 45.8
146% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 160
171% 286 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 125%
Seagate ST1500DL001-9VT15L 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC98
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 130 138 134 138 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 123
Write 139
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 136
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 71%
WDC WD10 SPZX-75Z10T3 1TB
160GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 71 71 69 70 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.8% Below average
Read 97.7
Write 81.7
Mixed 50
SusWrite 70.6
98% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
105% 1.27 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64AZ-1G6P1 1315 CT102464BA160B.C16 1315 CT102464BA160B.C16 16KTF1G64AZ-1G6P1 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.7% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 14.7
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 15.7
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 31.5" 1280 720 GSM76F3 32inch LG FHD
Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,692 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback