Asus PRIME B450M-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B450M-A  (all builds)
Memory54.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190118
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateDec 17 '23 at 18:22
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 58.6
1-Core 108
2-Core 220
69% 129 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 387
49% 373 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7750
Device(1545 7750) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
7.65% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 14.2
7% 12.8 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 9.5
Splatting 10.2
9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.65%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$81
760GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 109 126 126 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 121
Write 78.9
Mixed 77
SusWrite 117
73% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 87%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 28 29 25 28 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD824A.C16FDD 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
83.8% Excellent
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 30
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 31.2
SC Mixed 22.8
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM729F S24R35A
Typical PRIME B450M-A Builds (Compare 10,561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B450M-A - $78

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $357
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback