GPD G1617-01

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive441% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemGPD G1617-01  (all builds)
MotherboardGPD G1617-01
Memory36 GB free of 64 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231202
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 17 '23 at 17:02
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 35.8
1-Core 181
2-Core 331
91% 183 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 820
86% 690 Pts
64-Core 969
60% 969 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
AMD(1002 15BF) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22.9% Poor
Lighting 23.6
Reflection 24.8
Parallax 42.6
19% 30.3 fps
MRender 24
Gravity 31.1
Splatting 49.1
30% 34.7 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPTQE-2T00 2TB
941GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2637 2557 2756 3128 3119 3111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
441% Outstanding
Read 3,477
Write 3,402
Mixed 2,600
SusWrite 2,885
695% 3,091 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 58.4
203% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,577
DQ Write 1,300
DQ Mixed 1,449
1,082% 1442 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 441%
Great: 554%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MT62F4G32D8DV-026 WT 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 42.3
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 52.3
122% 42.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 24.9
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 46.2
87% 46.2 ns
Poor: 97%
This bench: 113%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 24" 1280 720 BNQ7D02 BenQ V2400Eco
Typical G1617-01 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: GPD G1617-01

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback