Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive43.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '23 at 13:49
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 73.5
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 215
70% 128 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 288
39% 290 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Lighting 13.2
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 18.2
11% 13.2 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 15.3
Splatting 12.2
10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Tammuz SSD 128GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02000009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 29 2.3 40 11 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 426
Write 125
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 25.1
34% 158 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 21.1
4K Mixed 16.9
74% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 2
DQ Mixed 1.8
15% 37.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
401GB free
Firmware: CA14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 108 108 108 108 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 110
Write 109
Mixed 59.1
SusWrite 108
70% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6DJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
47.6% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 15.8
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 14.6
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 13: 0P 1R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 7% 70 56 30 60 23.8" 1920 1080 DELD0DA DELL P2419H
Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,710 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $413
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback