Alienware Aurora R7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemAlienware Aurora R7  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0VDT73
Memory55.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220119
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 17 '23 at 13:19
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$190
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 88.3
1-Core 120
2-Core 247
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 783
75% 617 Pts
64-Core 962
60% 962 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Dell(1028 3600) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 186
Parallax 180
141% 180 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 178
Splatting 123
116% 144 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 4TB-$293
3TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 624331WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1152
Write 463
Mixed 1,692
246% 1,102 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 26.4
4K Mixed 36.7
114% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 924
DQ Write 656
DQ Mixed 829
608% 803 MB/s
Poor: 292% Great: 682%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$27
124GB free
Firmware: MS2OA810
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 111
Write 119
Mixed 22.4
61% 84 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown XRMWRN-MIE 393998041100 XRMWRN-HYA 343398011100 XRMWRN-MIE 343398011100 XRMWRN-MIE 64GB
2800, 2800, 2800, 2800 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
91.7% Outstanding
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 29.2
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 39.3
SC Mixed 28.1
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 49 0 32" 1280 720 MST0030 MStar Demo
Typical Aurora R7 Builds (Compare 5,258 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier

System: Alienware Aurora R7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $431
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback