MSI P67A-C43 (MS-7673)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7673
MotherboardMSI P67A-C43 (MS-7673)  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '18 at 04:24
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 6.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 94
1-Core 119
2-Core 241
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 478
63% 471 Pts
64-Core 479
30% 479 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Zotac(19DA 2445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 141
Reflection 149
Parallax 129
115% 140 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 135
Splatting 114
96% 117 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 107%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 480GB-$81
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 492
Write 422
Mixed 447
101% 454 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 14
75% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 20.8
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 13.7
42% 83 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$128
89GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 108
Write 81
Mixed 86.9
69% 92 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 2.16
4K Mixed 0.32
101% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
62.3% Good
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 19.4
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 19.2
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P67A-C43 (MS-7673) Builds (Compare 305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI P67A-C43 (MS-7673) - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $822
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback