Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 88% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 87% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	89.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	33.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211029
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 17 '23 at 02:59
Run Duration	268 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10700K-$224 198,859 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	93.7% Outstanding	Memory 90 1-Core 140 2-Core 270 92% 167 Pts	4-Core 522 8-Core 935 88% 729 Pts	64-Core 1376 85% 1376 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 93.7% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 868E) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (53^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	89.8% Excellent	Lighting 114 Reflection 102 Parallax 105 93% 107 fps	MRender 128 Gravity 97 Splatting 87.6 83% 104 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme WDS100T3XHC-00SJ 1TB 310 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 625GB free (System drive) Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1605 1046 958 931 1047 910 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	238% Outstanding	Read 1,804 Write 2,026 Mixed 1,563 SusWrite 1,083 364% 1,619 MB/s	4K Read 38 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 56.6 196% 72.7 MB/s	DQ Read 989 DQ Write 755 DQ Mixed 924 677% 889 MB/s
Poor: 183% ↑ This bench: 238% Great: 317%
Nvme Seagate BarraCud 1TB 110 User benchmarks, average bench 220% 357GB free Firmware: STPSC014 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1850 1826 2068 1480 996 1003 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	249% Outstanding	Read 1,355 Write 2,076 Mixed 1487 SusWrite 1,537 366% 1,614 MB/s	4K Read 39.6 4K Write 99.9 4K Mixed 52.6 180% 64 MB/s	DQ Read 1,136 DQ Write 916 DQ Mixed 1,046 777% 1,033 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 249% Great: 287%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 530GB free Firmware: M3CR033 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 348 359 364 355 367 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
Seagate ST4000NE001-2MA101 4TB 200 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1.5TB free Firmware: EN01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 164 169 174 173 173 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 107%
Seagate ST6000VN0011-1UL17Z 6TB 1,358 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 139 150 141 140 139 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	83.4% Excellent	Read 151 Write 151 Mixed 72 SusWrite 139 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 107%
Seagate ST6000VN0011-1UL17Z 6TB 1,358 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 143 143 142 140 143 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Read 143 Write 144 Mixed 78.4 SusWrite 142 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 318% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 107%
Seagate ST6000VN0011-1UL17Z 6TB 1,358 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 169 169 168 168 170 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	92.2% Outstanding	Read 151 Write 144 Mixed 72.5 SusWrite 169 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 7.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 409% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 92.2% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB 6,447 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	MC Read 30.1 MC Write 29.5 MC Mixed 25.5 81% 28.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 33.8 SC Mixed 23.7 70% 24.7 GB/s	Latency 63.9 63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 136%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	54	100	43.4"	1280 720	SAM0F5B C43J89x

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 5,311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 143%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 142%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS (WI-FI) - $201

CPU
Core i7-10700KIntel $224Bench 97%, 198,859 samples	1,676x
Core i9-10850KIntel $249Bench 99%, 84,873 samples	515x
Core i5-10600KIntel $125Bench 92%, 70,951 samples	499x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	779x
RTX 3080Nvidia $700Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	620x
RTX 3060Nvidia $253Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	327x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $99Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	366x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $149Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	215x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $142Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	212x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	150x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $120Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	142x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $1,063

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293