Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory21.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime26.9 Days
Run DateDec 16 '23 at 18:11
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 76.4
1-Core 163
2-Core 337
101% 192 Pts
4-Core 579
8-Core 942
93% 761 Pts
64-Core 1,107
68% 1,107 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 149
Parallax 140
111% 142 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 143
Splatting 126
106% 130 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC120G3LC709B121-490P 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: 560ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 146 144 143 145 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 400
Write 134
Mixed 197
SusWrite 145
48% 219 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 35.9
132% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 157
119% 160 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 67%
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 613000WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3129
Write 4,491
Mixed 3182
809% 3,601 MB/s
4K Read 74.2
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 95.2
337% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,384
DQ Write 1,145
DQ Mixed 1,278
953% 1,269 MB/s
Poor: 264% Great: 573%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
464GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 416 406 406 405 407 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 440
Mixed 406
SusWrite 411
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 87.2
4K Mixed 50.4
171% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 163
132% 187 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 107%
Great: 126%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 154 163 121 103 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 164
Write 159
Mixed 102
SusWrite 144
105% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-8GVKB Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ F4-3200C16-8GVKB Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.2% Good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 25.8
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 27.2
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 42" 1280 720 SNYDD02 SONY TV
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,748 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,166
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback