HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8437
Memory12.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191210
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 16 '23 at 17:26
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 198
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 403
45% 354 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$283
MSI(1462 3903) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 123
Parallax 119
111% 126 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 96.8
Splatting 92.6
87% 108 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 39 15 16 40 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 997GB
42GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 186 105 57 64 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 193
Write 524
Mixed 127
SusWrite 92.4
53% 234 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 6.9
46% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 411
DQ Write 85.5
DQ Mixed 197
158% 231 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 134%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
193GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3NH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 59 67 69 61 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 56.5
Write 8.9
Mixed 37.6
SusWrite 66.4
31% 42.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 68%
MDT MD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB
71GB free
Firmware: 02.01C03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 34 37 38 36 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 58.7
Write 41.9
Mixed 39.9
SusWrite 36.5
33% 44.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G32C16U4B.16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
77.2% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 25.2
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 19.4
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 12 214 59 144 27" 1920 1009 ACR06E2 VG271
Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx Builds (Compare 2,966 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $366
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback