Medion MD34830

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 151%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive288% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemMedion MD34830  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B660M DS3H AX DDR4
Memory41 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '23 at 15:20
Run Duration291 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 87.3
1-Core 198
2-Core 390
118% 225 Pts
4-Core 747
8-Core 1,296
124% 1,021 Pts
64-Core 1,909
118% 1,909 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 113%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Zotac(19DA 9630) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
132% Outstanding
Lighting 185
Reflection 177
Parallax 168
151% 177 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 138
Splatting 118
118% 149 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 132%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E15-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R 1TB
616GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EHFM31.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2497 2613 1654 154 160 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
288% Outstanding
Read 1,660
Write 2,628
Mixed 1,522
SusWrite 1,205
396% 1,754 MB/s
4K Read 67.1
4K Write 213
4K Mixed 87.7
327% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,254
DQ Write 899
DQ Mixed 1,110
820% 1,087 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 288%
Great: 333%
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 960GB
126GB free
Firmware: SBFA16.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 363 219 226 226 224 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 342
Write 106
Mixed 215
SusWrite 282
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 37.6
135% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 224
194% 286 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 103%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$64
274GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 462 462 440 418 422 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 464
Mixed 426
SusWrite 444
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 46.5
159% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 295
235% 329 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 112%
Great: 125%
Fanxiang S500PRO 2TB
797GB free
Firmware: SN10093
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2128 1861 721 375 382 268 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 1888
Write 2191
Mixed 1,934
SusWrite 956
392% 1,742 MB/s
4K Read 60.7
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 78.5
255% 85.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,291
DQ Write 775
DQ Mixed 601
564% 889 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 259%
Great: 368%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A.M16FE Hynix HMA81GU6DJR8N-XN CT16G4DFRA32A.M16FE Hynix HMA81GU6DJR8N-XN 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 37.7
MC Mixed 35.2
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 45.2
SC Mixed 32.1
96% 33.6 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.5" 1920 1009 SAM0D2C C24F390
Typical MD34830 Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 139%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

System: Medion MD34830

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $340
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback