Asus PRIME B550-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics7.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 16 '23 at 07:53
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$166
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 92
1-Core 172
2-Core 344
109% 203 Pts
4-Core 678
8-Core 1303
118% 990 Pts
64-Core 1,567
97% 1,567 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 109%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4770
Sapphire(174B 1250) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
7.23% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 12.4
Parallax 8.6
7% 10 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 8
Splatting 9.2
7% 8.5 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.23%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$65
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 328
Write 211
Mixed 246
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 32
123% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 172
133% 181 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 84%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
143GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 87.5
Write 88.1
Mixed 60.4
59% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 69%
Kingston DT microDuo 3C 124GB
115GB free, PID 16ae
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 229
Write 50.3
Mixed 26.9
92% 102 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 2.5
143% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$63
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
88% Excellent
MC Read 36
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 32.1
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 30.7
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 36.7
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 88%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 5 60 20" 1280 720 BNQ781E BenQ G2020HDA
Typical PRIME B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,968 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $514
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback