Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HF_FX506HF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HF_FX506HF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506HF
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230720
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 16 '23 at 00:05
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i5-11260H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 71.2
1-Core 150
2-Core 252
86% 157 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 834
84% 679 Pts
64-Core 1,043
64% 1,043 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050
Asus(1043 3088) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4633
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Lighting 81.8
Reflection 56
Parallax 73.7
67% 70.5 fps
MRender 42.7
Gravity 56.3
Splatting 54.8
42% 51.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 58%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-1002 512GB
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73101000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,141
Write 3,476
Mixed 2,453
744% 3,357 MB/s
4K Read 75.6
4K Write 227
4K Mixed 94.2
355% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 1,316
DQ Write 979
DQ Mixed 1,075
823% 1,123 MB/s
Poor: 198% Great: 485%
hp v236w 64GB
41GB free, PID 7d40
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 38.4
Write 3.5
Mixed 2
11% 14.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 14.1
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 13
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 97.6
41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 13: 0P 1R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 23% 22 216 59 144 15.5" 1280 720 NCP004D
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HF_FX506HF Builds (Compare 836 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HF_FX506HF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback