| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Razer Blade R2 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte Blade |
| Memory | 5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20121019 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 15 '23 at 20:37 |
| Run Duration | 137 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 45% |
PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3632QM
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
59%
Above average
|
57% 95.7 Pts
|
36% 284 Pts
|
22% 348 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 6745) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
|
3.2%
Terrible
|
3% 2.9 fps
|
3% 3.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 285 287 285 287 288 MB/s
|
75.2%
Very good
|
68% 304 MB/s
|
92% 32.1 MB/s
|
200% 291 MB/s
|
|
Microsoft Storage Space Device 254GB
180GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 307 302 279 278 274 MB/s
|
66.7%
Good
|
70% 312 MB/s
|
62% 19.9 MB/s
|
249% 330 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Transcend TS512MSK64V6N 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
49.8%
Average
|
51% 17.8 GB/s
|
37% 13 GB/s
|
46% 86.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 41 | 7 | 60 | 17.3" | 1920 1017 | LGD02DA |
Typical Blade R2 Builds (Compare 11 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Razer Blade R2
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 8x |
| GTX 660MNvidiaBench 7%, 7,381 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |