Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive77.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemGigabyte B360M AORUS Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200916
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateDec 15 '23 at 20:14
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 81.8
1-Core 128
2-Core 244
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 760
74% 606 Pts
64-Core 944
58% 944 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 83%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 140 123 129 124 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 468
Write 178
Mixed 208
SusWrite 134
54% 247 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 30.6
123% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 179
167% 263 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 128%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40
212GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 96 96 96 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 139
Write 130
Mixed 90.7
SusWrite 96.3
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6B1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
69.5% Good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 22.6
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 22.7
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 0 240 0" 1280 720
Typical GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,925 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $461
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback