MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics69% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190903
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '23 at 17:12
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 81
1-Core 125
2-Core 245
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 700
73% 585 Pts
64-Core 918
57% 918 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69% Good
Lighting 91.1
Reflection 88.7
Parallax 76.7
74% 85.5 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 79.2
Splatting 70.6
59% 71.8 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69%
Great: 73%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S101 1TB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW210415
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 5.7 393 407 388 413 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 3,978
Write 3.7
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 304
224% 1,073 MB/s
4K Read 185
4K Mixed 0
420% 92.4 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL17-17-17 D4-2400 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 29.1
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 25.4
74% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 27" 1280 720 DELF115 DELL SE2719HR
Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,895 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback