Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230528
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 15 '23 at 13:16
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i7-1260P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 68.2
1-Core 140
2-Core 265
84% 158 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 649
71% 564 Pts
64-Core 938
58% 938 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4889
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 17.3
Reflection 20.6
Parallax 20.5
14% 19.5 fps
MRender 18.7
Gravity 28.6
Splatting 10.7
15% 19.3 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gofatoo 2TB SSD 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN15261
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 270 286 270 300 324 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 328
Write 341
Mixed 321
SusWrite 288
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 15.6
56% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 229
161% 201 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 301%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KINSOTIN16GB2666MHZ 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.4% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 25
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 17.5
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 40 8 240 16" 1280 720 BOE0B87
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,709 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback