BOXX 3DBOXX W4150

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemBOXX 3DBOXX W4150  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GRYPHON Z87
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130517
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '23 at 11:16
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 74.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 211
74% 133 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 539
54% 441 Pts
64-Core 572
35% 572 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
EVGA(3842 1784) 3GB
CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 474.30
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.7% Average
Lighting 52.2
Reflection 57.2
Parallax 67.6
42% 59 fps
MRender 67.2
Gravity 62.8
Splatting 52.7
49% 60.9 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 83 90 85 54 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 463
Write 330
Mixed 401
SusWrite 87.1
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 30.9
130% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 35.7
82% 169 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
359GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 66 67 63 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 61.3
Write 62.3
Mixed 42.4
SusWrite 64.6
42% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 43%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
411GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 107 107 108 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 107
Write 101
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 106
69% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 63%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$27
436GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 71 75 76 78 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 75.7
Write 70.8
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 73.8
48% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 43%
WD Drive 2657 2TB
233GB free, PID 2657
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 70 76 84 83 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
41% Average
Read 76.6
Write 102
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 77.3
112% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.3
155% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 41%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 0118 HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB Micron 16KTF1G64AZ-1G6P1 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
51.7% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 15.4
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 15.3
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 95.4
42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 21.5" 1280 720 VSC6F2E VA2246 Series
Typical 3DBOXX W4150 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: BOXX 3DBOXX W4150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $207
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback