MSI MAG B650M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7D76)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 422%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 422%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics374% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D76
MotherboardMSI MAG B650M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7D76)  (all builds)
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231205
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateDec 15 '23 at 09:22
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$320
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 192
2-Core 393
120% 227 Pts
4-Core 754
8-Core 1,304
125% 1,029 Pts
64-Core 1,738
108% 1,738 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 118%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,650
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
374% Outstanding
Lighting 584
Reflection 600
Parallax 771
476% 652 fps
MRender 541
Gravity 587
Splatting 310
376% 480 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 374%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
669GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFMC0.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2805 2135 1009 1044 1022 1053 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 1,271
Write 3,105
Mixed 1,802
SusWrite 1,511
438% 1,922 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 66.8
218% 77.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,539
DQ Write 780
DQ Mixed 1,363
958% 1,228 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 263%
Great: 320%
Spcc Solid State Disk 2TB
706GB free
Firmware: H201230
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 466 460 464 463 432 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 421
Write 481
Mixed 323
SusWrite 447
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 44.1
146% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 292
209% 266 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55
35GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 49 49 49 50 50 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
44% Average
Read 104
Write 21.8
Mixed 36.3
SusWrite 49.4
39% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RG30D516GX2-5600C36A 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
198% Outstanding
MC Read 83.9
MC Write 62.3
MC Mixed 69.7
206% 72 GB/s
SC Read 63.9
SC Write 62.4
SC Mixed 60.2
178% 62.2 GB/s
Latency 50.5
79% 50.5 ns
Poor: 143%
This bench: 198%
Great: 185%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM0C3F SAMSUNG
Typical MAG B650M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7D76) Builds (Compare 79 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 414%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 420%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B650M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7D76)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $2,075
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback