Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 months ago, 5 months ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200121
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 15 '23 at 07:20
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	BGD-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400-$161 22,187 User benchmarks, average bench 86% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	78% Very good	Memory 71.1 1-Core 117 2-Core 236 77% 141 Pts	4-Core 458 8-Core 646 69% 552 Pts	64-Core 659 41% 659 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 65,338 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	4.71% Terrible	Lighting 5.4 Reflection 5 Parallax 5.7 4% 5.37 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 5.3 Splatting 8.4 5% 6.2 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.71% Great: 7%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Twinmos SSD 128GB 500 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: H220902a Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 583 Write 544 Mixed 562 126% 563 MB/s	4K Read 45.2 4K Write 98 4K Mixed 59.1 196% 67.4 MB/s	DQ Read 245 DQ Write 547 DQ Mixed 316 264% 369 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 156%
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$33 20,238 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 11GB free Firmware: SBFMBB.3 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 378 Write 387 Mixed 346 83% 370 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 78 4K Mixed 35.7 131% 47.5 MB/s	DQ Read 242 DQ Write 5.1 DQ Mixed 13.2 37% 86.8 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 91%
VendorCo ProductCode 64GB 454 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 59GB free, PID 1234 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 32.7 Write 7 Mixed 6.7 14% 15.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 25% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Goodram GR26C16S8K1HU408 1x8GB 123 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile)	20% Very poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 7 20% 7.03 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 7.5 20% 7.07 GB/s	Latency 390 10% 390 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	61	46	60	21.5"	1280 720	HPN3542 HP 22fw

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M M.2 2.0 Builds (Compare 1,525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $94Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	396x
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	344x
Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples	147x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	118x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	85x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	74x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	130x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	49x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	49x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	62x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	43x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	39x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $256

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16