Asus TP203NAH

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus TP203NAH  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TP203NAH
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '23 at 06:34
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium N4200
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
27% Poor
Memory 28.1
1-Core 42.1
2-Core 82
28% 50.7 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 148
20% 149 Pts
64-Core 149
9% 149 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Asus(1043 1930) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.5127
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
1.9% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 2
2% 1.9 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 2.2
2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.9%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
909GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 98 96 115 107 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 95.3
Write 98.3
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 99.9
63% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.6
170% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 6.2
19% 6.5 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 3.9
10% 3.67 GB/s
Latency 264
15% 264 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 30 60 11.6" 1280 720 CMN1141
Typical TP203NAH Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TP203NAH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback