HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20161005
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 15 '23 at 02:47
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 55%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 89.1
2-Core 178
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 315
42% 314 Pts
64-Core 321
20% 321 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
PNY(196E 1327) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.1% Average
Lighting 57.6
Reflection 58
Parallax 50.3
47% 55.3 fps
MRender 42.9
Gravity 51.4
Splatting 46.5
38% 46.9 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$371
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 49 75 60 87 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 461
Write 441
Mixed 416
SusWrite 66.5
77% 346 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 33.6
108% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 39.1
DQ Write 73.8
DQ Mixed 50.3
40% 54.4 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 137%
WD Red 6TB (2019)-$129
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 52 77 60 88 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 143
Write 103
Mixed 30.1
SusWrite 69.9
63% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.6
209% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 52 77 61 87 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 80.9
Write 127
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 70
63% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
80% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 18
58% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 17.2
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 59 60 24" 1280 720 ACR078F KA242Y B
Typical Compaq Pro 6300 MT Builds (Compare 1,926 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback