Asus G750JW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemAsus G750JW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G750JW
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131211
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 15 '23 at 01:45
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 87.6
2-Core 167
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 446
45% 367 Pts
64-Core 453
28% 453 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 765M
Asus(1043 119D) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 14.1
Parallax 19.2
12% 16.2 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 20.4
Splatting 14.7
14% 17.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SA510 2.5 1TB
789GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 52046100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 365 420 445 437 432 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 376
Write 423
Mixed 388
SusWrite 420
91% 402 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 50.9
4K Mixed 30.3
102% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 302
235% 323 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
55.5% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.7
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 18.8
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 12: 0P 1R 1G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
12% 8% 79 180 60 60 17.3" 1280 720 CMO1720
Typical G750JW Builds (Compare 393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G750JW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $408
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback