Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R (all builds)
Memory	18.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110516
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 14 '23 at 22:52
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	67% Good	Memory 90.3 1-Core 73.7 2-Core 142 63% 102 Pts	4-Core 238 8-Core 350 37% 294 Pts	64-Core 333 21% 333 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520 16,336 User benchmarks, average bench 2% POV(1ACC 522C) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.67% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 0.5 2% 1.67 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 1.9 2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.67% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Intenso SATAIII 960GB 497 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 822GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0423B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 196 188 188 199 206 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.2% Poor	Read 224 Write 189 Mixed 9.5 SusWrite 196 34% 154 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 0.4 28% 7.27 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 104%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109 43,695 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 578GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 63 64 66 65 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	49% Average	Read 106 Write 99.1 Mixed 71.1 SusWrite 64.1 63% 85.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 69%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 456GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 63 64 66 65 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	39.7% Below average	Read 73.8 Write 74.5 Mixed 48.7 SusWrite 64 48% 65.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 51%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 14,232 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 837GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 103 102 103 104 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	43% Average	Read 104 Write 89.9 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 102 109% 83.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 49%
HGST HTS 541010A9E680 1TB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 926GB free, PID 0701 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 30 27 31 30 31 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	Read 162 Write 29.9 Mixed 36 SusWrite 29.3 65% 64.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.5 30% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 6 slots used 24GB DIMM Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	MC Read 18.8 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 19.5 51% 18 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 13.1 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 66.7 60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	42	33	60	27.2"	1920 1017	GSM5C02 LG ULTRAGEAR

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X58A-UD3R Builds (Compare 2,022 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R - $210

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	627x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	406x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	218x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	149x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	104x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	102x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	70x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	57x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	343x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	331x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	224x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $397

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16