Hp-pavilion AZ222AV-ABA HPE-180t

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics78.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemHp-pavilion AZ222AV-ABA HPE-180t  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON TRUCKEE
Memory19 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '23 at 22:27
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 67%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 975-$550
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 86.3
2-Core 172
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 384
41% 327 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.8% Very good
Lighting 95.7
Reflection 112
Parallax 98.6
78% 102 fps
MRender 95.4
Gravity 97.8
Splatting 100
80% 97.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$175
923GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 183 233 244 248 237 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.5% Good
Read 260
Write 248
Mixed 237
SusWrite 215
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 29.4
98% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 192
144% 191 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
333GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 150 154 158 155 156 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 146
Write 120
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 149
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 16
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 13.7
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 21.6" 1280 720 HWP282C HP 2159
Typical AZ222AV-ABA HPE-180t Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion AZ222AV-ABA HPE-180t

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback