MSI MEG Z390 ACE (MS-7B12)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 243%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 221%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics247% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B12
MotherboardMSI MEG Z390 ACE (MS-7B12)  (all builds)
Memory56.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221101
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 14 '23 at 21:33
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 98.3
1-Core 152
2-Core 295
101% 182 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 887
89% 722 Pts
64-Core 1,118
69% 1,118 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 101%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-Ti
Gigabyte(1458 40A6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 22.5GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Lighting 373
Reflection 332
Parallax 382
304% 362 fps
MRender 390
Gravity 326
Splatting 215
244% 311 fps
Poor: 205%
This bench: 247%
Great: 247%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
404GB free
Firmware: M3CR045
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 382 393 403 419 410 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 378
Write 457
Mixed 390
SusWrite 399
92% 406 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 90.2
4K Mixed 54.7
179% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 157
173% 293 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 111%
Great: 125%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1084 707 685 662 635 614 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 2,530
Write 2,317
Mixed 1,873
SusWrite 731
416% 1,863 MB/s
4K Read 59
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 79.6
259% 88.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,074
DQ Write 834
DQ Mixed 920
698% 943 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 269%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
89GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,570
Write 2,097
Mixed 1,926
489% 2198 MB/s
4K Read 58.3
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 79
251% 84.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,145
DQ Write 814
DQ Mixed 965
725% 975 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$300
87GB free
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,660
Write 2,291
Mixed 1,428
471% 2,126 MB/s
4K Read 51.1
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 70.1
234% 82.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,159
DQ Write 852
DQ Mixed 992
745% 1,001 MB/s
Poor: 215% Great: 425%
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$68
25GB free
Firmware: Q0125A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 51 54 35 47 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 118%
Seagate ST4000DM006-2G5107 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: DN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 122 121 123 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 120
Write 128
Mixed 85.6
SusWrite 121
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1.1
239% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 126%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
195GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 135 139 135 140 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 133
Write 109
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 135
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 42.3
MC Mixed 33.1
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 49.1
SC Mixed 34.6
102% 35.7 GB/s
Latency 45.7
88% 45.7 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 110%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 34.1" 1280 720 DELA0A6 DELL U3415W
Typical MEG Z390 ACE (MS-7B12) Builds (Compare 3,157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG Z390 ACE (MS-7B12) - $243

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback