Asus H81M-R

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 months ago, 4 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-R (all builds)
Memory	2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160429
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 14 '23 at 20:48
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Memory 86.8 1-Core 85.1 2-Core 158 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 214 8-Core 294 32% 254 Pts	64-Core 296 18% 296 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 84DC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 275 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.1% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 4.2 Parallax 1.2 3% 3.07 fps	MRender 4.2 Gravity 4.1 Splatting 3.3 3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.1% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Patriot P210 256GB 5,446 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN08213 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 105 7.4 87 25 9.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	Read 365 Write 339 Mixed 170 SusWrite 40.2 51% 229 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 7.4 4K Mixed 9.3 57% 14.6 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 499GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 114 116 113 119 115 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	71.7% Very good	Read 134 Write 116 Mixed 25.1 SusWrite 116 71% 97.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SP008GLLTU160N02 1x8GB 225 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	32% Below average	MC Read 10.3 MC Write 10.9 MC Mixed 9.2 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 9.3 27% 9.47 GB/s	Latency 64.7 62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	60	21.5"	1280 720	PHLC0AA 227E4QH

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-R Builds (Compare 595 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H81M-R

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	135x
Core i3-4170Intel $59Bench 57%, 48,178 samples	88x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	38x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	59x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	38x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	36x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	41x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	29x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	14x

RAM
99U5471-054.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 30%, 12,132 samples	22x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 26,466 samples	14x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $281

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16