Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211126
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 14 '23 at 16:29
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X-$102
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 73.9
1-Core 110
2-Core 220
74% 135 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 414
52% 393 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
Palit(1569 0FC8) 1GB
CLim: 993 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 474.64
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
6.65% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 8.8
6% 8.13 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 11.1
Splatting 9.2
8% 9.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.65%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD R5MP120G8 120GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1103F0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 188 193 61 69 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 1,560
Write 492
Mixed 592
SusWrite 131
151% 693 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 27.1
167% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 396
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 72.1
103% 199 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 131%
Great: 168%
Adata SU655 120GB
109GB free
Firmware: V8X01b05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 366 369 379 243 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 406
Write 352
Mixed 328
SusWrite 316
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 33.4
120% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 185
142% 189 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 81%
Great: 94%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$40
415GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 178 184 182 186 187 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 132
Write 119
Mixed 15.9
SusWrite 183
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
145% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 107%
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50
159GB free
Firmware: AX002J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 81 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 81.2
Write 86.4
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 81
51% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 31.7
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 25.3
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 24" 1280 720 BNQ7840 BenQ G2420HD
Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,035 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $348
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback