HP EliteDesk 705 G2 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G2 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 805A
Memory0.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161101
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 14 '23 at 12:39
Run Duration337 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A4-8350B R5, 6 Compute Cores 2C+4G
XU1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
21% Poor
Memory 34.2
1-Core 26.6
2-Core 34.7
21% 31.8 Pts
4-Core 46.2
8-Core 44.3
6% 45.2 Pts
64-Core 56.6
4% 56.6 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 805A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
2.56% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 6.2
3% 5.43 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 5.7
2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.56%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CA14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 23 11 16 18 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
6.43% Terrible
Read 5.5
Write 6.9
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 16.9
6% 8.88 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 6.43%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x] Emaxx Kingston 99P5471-011.A00LF 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.17 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 0.9
5% 1.9 GB/s
Latency 190
21% 190 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 24 8 60 21.5" 1280 720 NEC68BF EA224WMi
Typical EliteDesk 705 G2 SFF Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G2 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback