Intel NUC10i7FNB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemIntel(R) NUC10i7FNK
MotherboardIntel NUC10i7FNB  (all builds)
Memory58.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231024
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 14 '23 at 11:35
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10710U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Memory 47.1
1-Core 33
2-Core 65.7
31% 48.6 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 190
20% 161 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2081) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
6.07% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 8.2
5% 7.9 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 7
Splatting 11.4
8% 9.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.07%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 576 568 563 548 552 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 807
Write 555
Mixed 579
SusWrite 549
139% 622 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 39.2
4K Mixed 31.7
105% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 239
162% 198 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 107%
Great: 282%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905744-067.A00G 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
45.9% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 19.1
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 9.6
26% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 180
22% 180 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 37.5" 1280 720 GSM7716 LG HDR WQHD
Typical NUC10i7FNB Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC10i7FNB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback